Your honor, my name is Squatters, and on behalf of the Forsyth Law Co., I am representing A1phaSniper in court today.
Recently, A1phaSniper was unjustly fired from his position as a Police Officer. The Minister of Justice, bharatj, claimed that my client was fired for "failure to meet the demands of the PO service", "failure to serve the people and protect the citizens of BC", "lack of respect" and insubordination. However, given the circumstances, this couldn't be any more from the truth.
My client says he was fired without warning. He was given a simple ultimatum after a mistake (which he later corrected) that he made: either resign, or be retrained (attached). He chose to be retrained. However, the retraining never happened, as A1phaSniper had assumed it would. After no future contact from the DoJ minister, my client was suddenly fired without little warning. While he was told to either take probation or be retrained, he wasn't aware his job status would jump immediately to a firing.
Shortly after being unfairly terminated, my client was sent further elaboration on the reasons he was fired.
For the sake of the court, I'll summarize the further elaboration. The full list will be attached.
- Disrespect: The main person my client showed disrespect to was Johnnyboi12345. However, once told this disrespect was an issue, my client fixed this issue up and began to ignore Johnnyboi12345 to deter any further disrespectful behavior.
- Failure to do job: This, simply put, is an exaggeration. Anything my client was informed about failing to do, he fixed. The disrespect? He fixed it. My client recalled one time that he wasn't paying attention in chat and missed a murder. However, once he realized his mistake, he quickly went to fix it, and in fact filed a PO report shortly after. In fact, shortly after this incident A1phaSniper was surprised with a knee-jerk ultimatum: either resign or take a training break. However, my client was never offered any training in the first place, and was still punished, putting the DoJ in the violation of the Rules and Policies Training Act passed in February.
That genuinely doesn't make any sense. Additionally, A1pha wasn't even warned that this was an issue that would lead to him being fired.
- Breaking protocol: I may be mistaken as times have changed since I was a Police Officer, but as far as I remember, having your Police Car on you at all times was never part of an official protocol laid out by the DoJ. Moreover, this is such a small nitpick (especially as my client wasn't warned about this behavior either), that it shouldn't be considered a genuine reason to fire someone. In fact, my client actually did have his PO car on him at most times, it was just in a shulker box in his inventory. Why should someone be fired over that?
Given the fact that A1phaSniper wasn't warned that he would be fired, especially after closing to be retrained when presented with an ultimatum, and cleaned up his act when he was told to leads to the conclusion that he was unjustly fired.
This lawsuit is able to proceed due to the parameters laid out in the Dismissal Amendment Act. Under these parameters, my client, A1phaSniper, is requesting that he regain his position as a Police Officer due to the unjust nature of his firing
My client has also additionally requested that Tree60NoScope is not the reigning Judge in this court case.
Recently, A1phaSniper was unjustly fired from his position as a Police Officer. The Minister of Justice, bharatj, claimed that my client was fired for "failure to meet the demands of the PO service", "failure to serve the people and protect the citizens of BC", "lack of respect" and insubordination. However, given the circumstances, this couldn't be any more from the truth.
My client says he was fired without warning. He was given a simple ultimatum after a mistake (which he later corrected) that he made: either resign, or be retrained (attached). He chose to be retrained. However, the retraining never happened, as A1phaSniper had assumed it would. After no future contact from the DoJ minister, my client was suddenly fired without little warning. While he was told to either take probation or be retrained, he wasn't aware his job status would jump immediately to a firing.
Shortly after being unfairly terminated, my client was sent further elaboration on the reasons he was fired.
For the sake of the court, I'll summarize the further elaboration. The full list will be attached.
- Disrespect: The main person my client showed disrespect to was Johnnyboi12345. However, once told this disrespect was an issue, my client fixed this issue up and began to ignore Johnnyboi12345 to deter any further disrespectful behavior.
- Failure to do job: This, simply put, is an exaggeration. Anything my client was informed about failing to do, he fixed. The disrespect? He fixed it. My client recalled one time that he wasn't paying attention in chat and missed a murder. However, once he realized his mistake, he quickly went to fix it, and in fact filed a PO report shortly after. In fact, shortly after this incident A1phaSniper was surprised with a knee-jerk ultimatum: either resign or take a training break. However, my client was never offered any training in the first place, and was still punished, putting the DoJ in the violation of the Rules and Policies Training Act passed in February.
That genuinely doesn't make any sense. Additionally, A1pha wasn't even warned that this was an issue that would lead to him being fired.
- Breaking protocol: I may be mistaken as times have changed since I was a Police Officer, but as far as I remember, having your Police Car on you at all times was never part of an official protocol laid out by the DoJ. Moreover, this is such a small nitpick (especially as my client wasn't warned about this behavior either), that it shouldn't be considered a genuine reason to fire someone. In fact, my client actually did have his PO car on him at most times, it was just in a shulker box in his inventory. Why should someone be fired over that?
Given the fact that A1phaSniper wasn't warned that he would be fired, especially after closing to be retrained when presented with an ultimatum, and cleaned up his act when he was told to leads to the conclusion that he was unjustly fired.
This lawsuit is able to proceed due to the parameters laid out in the Dismissal Amendment Act. Under these parameters, my client, A1phaSniper, is requesting that he regain his position as a Police Officer due to the unjust nature of his firing
My client has also additionally requested that Tree60NoScope is not the reigning Judge in this court case.