Lawsuit: Adjourned Amoeba Co.'s Redstone Division VS United Casino & Resort

Discussion in 'Courthouse' started by CrackedAmoeba, Mar 1, 2020.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. _Info_

    _Info_ Minister of Economy Minister of Economy Donator

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2017
    Messages:
    399
    _Info_
    @CrackedAmoeba Was the contract made in a voice chat? If not please, provide evidence of such a contract existing.
     
  2. CrackedAmoeba

    CrackedAmoeba Citizen Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2018
    Messages:
    105
    CrackedAmoeba1
    Your honor,

    The contract was made over VC. If the court does not render a verbal contract viable, then it is also not required I give back any payment as the defendant paid me before hand by their choice and there was still a job done.
     
    Johnnyboi12345 likes this.
  3. _Info_

    _Info_ Minister of Economy Minister of Economy Donator

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2017
    Messages:
    399
    _Info_

    Thank you. Would the defense have anything more to add before I begin reviewing all testimony provided.
     
  4. NetPex

    NetPex Justin Donator

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2019
    Messages:
    101
    NetPex
    Your honor, I have nothing to say I would just like this to be done but I'm not sure about max, sir.
     
  5. _Info_

    _Info_ Minister of Economy Minister of Economy Donator

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2017
    Messages:
    399
    _Info_
    Alright. I will begin reviewing all evidence provided.
     
  6. Maxterpiece

    Maxterpiece Police Officer Police Officer Donator

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2019
    Messages:
    70
    Maxterpiece
    Your honor, I would like to point out that before the incident that Pig_Girl had described happened, the plaintiff, Pig_Girl, and myself had been in a voice chat to discuss the project that ACRD had been commissioned to do. Considering Pig_Girl was not part of making the deal that would imply one of two things. Either Pig_Girl is part of our company, or Pig_Girl is a witness. If the plaintiff had assumed the former, then that would imply that the plaintiff had lied about not knowing that Pig_Girl is part of the company. If the plaintiff had assumed the latter, then that would imply that the plaintiff had admitted to having intentions to use witness intimidation by saying that they were recording the conversation in an attempt to scare Pig_Girl. Either way, both of these scenarios involve the plaintiff threatening the integrity of this case.
     
  7. _Info_

    _Info_ Minister of Economy Minister of Economy Donator

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2017
    Messages:
    399
    _Info_
    Thank you max, I will consider this in my review.
     
  8. _Info_

    _Info_ Minister of Economy Minister of Economy Donator

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2017
    Messages:
    399
    _Info_
    After reviewing the evidence provided in the case I have come to the conclusion that this case would have been a lot easier if the two parties had a written contract. Let this serve as a lesson.

    That being said, the evidence provided clearly proves that the defense paid the plaintiff in full prior to the work being completed. 10,000 Krunas is not a small sum of money, and what the Plaintiff is asking for as compensation (K,5000 for stealing property) is unnecessary considering Mr. Cracked had already received k10,000 in full prior to the work being completed.

    I am ruling in favor of the Plaintiff, but will not be awarding him the compensation requested.

    Adjourned.

    Adjourned: This case was presided by Judge _Info_
    Court Status: This court case is resolved and adjourned by Judge _Info_
     
    CrackedAmoeba likes this.