Lawsuit Olefante V. Government

Discussion in 'Courthouse' started by olefante, Nov 25, 2018.

  1. Matt

    Matt Capitalist Judge Judge Donator

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2017
    Messages:
    308
    Matty707
    @olefante Sure, go ahead. And yes, but one at a time please.
     
  2. olefante

    olefante Capitalist/Economist Donator

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2017
    Messages:
    319
    olefante
    Okay.
    To start off, I would like to say all evidence in favor of the plaintiff in this case has been out of topic and purely relating to how I used to be against the government and NOT how they unfairly punished me. If they wanted a test subject for community service they could've offered it to someone who would've normally been perm banned or something similar to that.
    Second off,
    Bharatj's CSI mole, Endeav0r collected that information for bharatj and the information is even as shown in the screenshot, is old news.

    The screenshot even shows the @deleted-role section which used to be @Black Agent and that is proof the protocols were no longer being used and was used TWO MONTHS ago.

    But still I will like to emphasize that this still doesnt have any relation to unfairly punishing me so my case stands with no defendant proof of innocence that actually relates to this current lawsuit.


    I will now summon witness #1, @DerpGaming20_YT to join us in this case.
     
    _litenerd likes this.
  3. DerpGaming20_YT

    DerpGaming20_YT Assistant Business Secretary Assistant Business Secretary

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2017
    Messages:
    82
    DerpGaming20_YT
    Thank you @olefante and Judge @Matt . I would like to begin by stating that I am a witness to what occured. Now, to get to business, I would like to point out that as Olefante stated, the government officials representing the government are going completely off topic. This case is about the unfair treatment of Olefante, not this "CSI" group. Now, the Evidence that bharatj has given regarding the real case is evidence that the government was discussing adding Community Service for a punishment. However, this is not about the fact that it was discussed before the events leading up to this case occurred, but the fact that Olefante was unfairly punished. It is stated in the Businesscraft Server Law:
    • Trespassing on Government Property
      • First Offence: k60 fine
      • Second Offence: k100 fine + 5 minutes jail
      • Third Offence: k100 fine + 10 minutes jail
      • Fourth Offence: k200 fine + 20 minutes jail
    I would like to put emphasis on the Second offense, as this was Olefante's Second offense of trespassing on Government Property. He was only due to a 100kruna fine and 5minutes of jail time. Instead, he was in a jail cell for well over 5 minutes, more than even 30 minutes, and then sentenced to a punishment that at the time was not even proposed, let alone in the Servers Laws. Additionally, the punishment he was unfairly sentenced, called "Community Service", was not even a service to the community, as the punishment was described as being placed inside obsidian, and given a wooden pickaxe. he was there for around an hour. The definition for Community Service, as stated at Dictionary.com, is as follows:

    noun Law.
    1. a punitive sentence that requires a convicted person to perform unpaid work for the community in lieu of imprisonment.
    As ive stated, there was no benefit of any kind to the community from Olefante's given punishment. And with that, the government had no right to put Olefante in the position they did as a punishment for his actions. The government, s at fault for what they did. All punishments shall be equal, no matter the receiver of the punishment's past.

    To finish off my statement, I would like to remind everyone what the real issue here is, the fact that Olefante was unfairly punished. That is the only reason this case was filed. So lets please make that the topic of all further testimonies and statements. And please remember to be honest.
     
    olefante, _litenerd and Technofied like this.
  4. olefante

    olefante Capitalist/Economist Donator

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2017
    Messages:
    319
    olefante

    Thank you. I will now call witness #2, @A1phaSniper .
     
  5. olefante

    olefante Capitalist/Economist Donator

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2017
    Messages:
    319
    olefante
    @Matt as A1phaSniper seems unresponsive to this thread, I am going to say that is all I have to say this turn.
     
  6. Matt

    Matt Capitalist Judge Judge Donator

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2017
    Messages:
    308
    Matty707
    Alright. I will need to read through all of the information provided by both parties and witnesses. I may need to seek guidance for this case, from an outside private source...

    My next response will be the deciding outcome for this lengthy court case.